<img height="1" width="1" src="https://www.facebook.com/tr?id=489193131421919&amp;ev=PageView%20&amp;noscript=1">
GoSafe, Inc.

INSTRUMENTATION

 EXPLAINED 

 

COMMON INSTRUMENTATION ISSUES


GS-B-Inst-SensorDrift-LP

The Silent Threat: Understanding and Combating Sensor Drift in Industrial Gas Monitoring

KEEPING READINGS ACCURATE

  • The Problem: Gas detectors are vital for industrial safety, but they are susceptible to sensor drift (a gradual, subtle change in a sensor's electrical output and accuracy over time) and degradation (a more pronounced decline, often leading to complete failure).

  • The Culprits: This decline is accelerated by:

    • Harsh Environmental Conditions: Extreme temperatures, fluctuating humidity, and corrosive agents.

    • Exposure to High Gas Concentrations: Prolonged or repeated exposure can overwhelm or chemically alter the sensing element.

    • Sensor Poisoning: Certain substances like silicones, chlorinated hydrocarbons, heavy metals, or even cleaning agents can permanently damage the sensor.

    • Mechanical Stress: Physical shocks or constant vibrations.

  • The Peril: Inaccurate readings can lead to serious safety lapses, including false alarms (causing downtime and complacency) or, most critically, missed alarms (personnel unknowingly exposed to hazards).

  • The Solution: Regular Calibration: The most effective defense is regular calibration, the process of adjusting a sensor’s output to match a known concentration of certified span gas, essentially "resetting" its accuracy.

    • Key Aspects: An effective program requires determining the right frequency (based on the environment and manufacturer's recommendations), using certified calibration gas, employing trained personnel, and maintaining meticulous documentation.

    • Bump Tests: Regular "bump tests" are also recommended as a quick check to confirm the sensor responds to gas between full calibrations.

  • Holistic Approach: A comprehensive strategy also includes proper sensor selection for the specific environment, routine maintenance and cleaning, environmental control, and establishing a proactive sensor replacement schedule rather than waiting for failure.

See The Full Article

GS-B-Inst-CalErrors-LP

Calibration Errors and Failure

CALIBRATE WITH CONFIDENCE

Understanding the causes of calibration errors and implementing best practices are essential steps in maintaining a safe environment.

Common Causes of Calibration Failure

A gas monitor's calibration confirms that the sensor is accurately measuring gas concentrations. If the monitor rejects the calibration, it’s a critical sign that something is wrong. Here are the most common culprits:

1. Expired or Incorrect Calibration Gas 

Calibration gas provides the known standard against which the monitor's sensors are adjusted.

  • Expired Gas: Over time, the concentration of gas in the cylinder can degrade or become unstable, especially for reactive gases like H2S (hydrogen sulfide) or CL2 (chlorine). Using an expired gas mixture means calibrating the monitor against a false standard, leading to inaccurate readings.

  • Incorrect Gas: Using the wrong gas concentration (e.g., 50 ppm CO when the monitor expects 100 ppm) or the wrong gas type entirely will result in a failed calibration. Always match the gas type and concentration to the monitor's specifications.

2. Sensor Lifespan and Degradation

Gas sensors, particularly electrochemical sensors used for toxic gases and catalytic bead sensors for combustible gases, have a finite operational life.

  • End-of-Life: Sensors nearing the end of their lifespan will often become less responsive, drift excessively, or fail to hold a calibration. They simply can no longer reliably detect or measure the target gas.

  • Poisoning or Inhibition: Certain substances, such as silicone vapors, heavy hydrocarbons, or high concentrations of H2S, can "poison" or inhibit the sensor's active material, leading to permanent damage and calibration failure.

3. Environmental Factors

The environment in which calibration is performed can significantly impact the process.

  • Temperature and Humidity: Gas monitors are typically calibrated at a specific temperature and humidity range. Extreme deviations (e.g., calibrating in a very cold or humid environment) can affect the sensor's electronic response, causing the calibration to fail. Always allow monitors to acclimatize to the calibration environment.

  • Pressure: While less common, significant changes in atmospheric pressure can influence some sensor types, requiring adjustment or compensation during calibration.

Best Practices and Solutions

Preventing calibration errors requires a proactive, systematic approach embedded in a robust maintenance program.

Cause Best Practice / Solution
Expired/Incorrect Gas Check Expiration Dates: Visually inspect all calibration gas cylinders and discard any that are past their expiration date. Verify Specifications: Always match the cylinder's gas type and concentration to the monitor's required values. Store cylinders correctly to avoid degradation.
Sensor Degradation Monitor Sensor Health: Most modern monitors provide a sensor life indication. Follow the manufacturer's recommended replacement schedule (e.g., every 2-3 years) even if the sensor appears operational. Replace any sensor that repeatedly fails calibration.
Environmental Factors Acclimatization: Calibrate monitors in an environment that is within the monitor's specified operational range for temperature and humidity. Allow stabilization before calibration, especially when moving a monitor from a cold outdoors to a warm indoor area.
General Failure Use Factory Equipment: Utilize the manufacturer's recommended flow regulators and tubing, as incorrect flow rates can prevent proper sensor exposure. Bump Test Regularly: Perform a quick "bump test" (exposure to gas without full adjustment) before each use to verify the monitor alarms and the sensor responds.
Read The Full Calibration Article

GS-B-Inst-CrossSens-LP

The False Alarm Dilemma: Understanding and Mitigating Gas Detector Cross-Sensitivity

Gas detection systems are essential guardians in industrial settings, protecting people and assets from invisible hazards. However, a common and vexing issue known as cross-sensitivity can undermine their reliability, leading to frequent false alarms and a dangerous complacency known as 'alarm fatigue'. Understanding this phenomenon is the first step toward maintaining system integrity and workplace safety.

What is Gas Detector Cross-Sensitivity?

Cross-sensitivity occurs when a gas detector reacts to a non-target gas because the interfering gas possesses a similar chemical or physical property to the one the sensor is designed to detect.

  • The Mimicry: Most common industrial gas sensors, particularly electrochemical and catalytic types, function by initiating a chemical reaction or physical change in the presence of the target gas. Cross-sensitivity happens when the interfering gas mimics this reaction or change. The sensor reads this 'mimic' signal and reports it as the target gas concentration, often triggering an alarm.

This isn't a sensor malfunction; it's a limitation based on the underlying detection technology. For instance, a sensor designed to oxidize a specific molecule may also oxidize a different, structurally similar molecule, resulting in an incorrect reading.

The Peril of Alarm Fatigue

False alarms aren't just an inconvenience—they pose a significant safety risk by introducing alarm fatigue.

  • The Cycle: When safety personnel are bombarded with frequent, non-hazardous alarms caused by cross-sensitivity, they start to lose faith in the system. The natural response to a constantly beeping device is to silence or ignore it.
  • The Danger: The true danger lies in the very real possibility that a genuine, life-threatening leak (a true threat) will occur during a period of high false alarms. Due to the preceding noise, personnel may delay their response, assume the alarm is 'just another false one,' or even bypass safety protocols altogether. This delay can have catastrophic consequences.

Common Examples of Cross-Sensitivity

Cross-sensitivity is a practical concern across various detection technologies. Here are a couple of notable examples:

  • Carbon Monoxide (CO) Sensors and Hydrogen (H₂): CO sensors are vital for detecting the colorless, odorless byproduct of incomplete combustion. However, many standard CO electrochemical sensors will also react significantly to Hydrogen (H₂) gas. Since H₂ is a common industrial component, fuel cell reactant, and even a natural byproduct in some processes, its presence can trigger an unnecessary CO alarm, even at safe CO levels.
  • Flammable Gas Sensors (LEL) and Siloxanes: Catalytic bead (pellistor) sensors, used to detect flammable gases (like methane or propane) in the Lower Explosive Limit (LEL) range, can suffer from sensor poisoning. While technically a different issue, the reaction to chemicals like siloxanes (found in some sealants and cleaning products) can permanently degrade the sensor's sensitivity, effectively rendering it useless or causing a persistently low, false reading when no gas is present.

Mitigating Cross-Sensitivity and Restoring System Integrity

Fortunately, manufacturers and safety engineers have developed effective strategies to minimize false alarms without compromising detection capabilities.

1. Consult the Manufacturer’s Cross-Sensitivity Chart

This is arguably the single most important step. Every reputable gas detector manufacturer provides a cross-sensitivity chart or table for each sensor type.

  • How to Read It: The chart lists various common interfering gases and provides a correction factor or a percentage sensitivity relative to the target gas.

    • Example: If a CO sensor chart shows a 50% sensitivity to H₂, it means a concentration of 100 ppm of H₂ will cause the sensor to read an equivalent of 50 ppm of CO.

  • Actionable Data: By comparing the chart data with the known background gases in your environment, you can understand the potential for false alarms and adjust alarm thresholds or select a more appropriate sensor technology.

2. Utilize Selective Filters and Compensated Sensors 

The most effective modern solution is the use of specialized chemical filters integrated directly into the sensor head.

  • CO Sensor with an H₂ Filter: To solve the common CO/H₂ cross-sensitivity issue, manufacturers offer CO sensors with an integrated Hydrogen-blocking filter. This chemical filter selectively removes or significantly reduces the H₂ molecules reaching the sensing electrode without impacting the CO molecules, dramatically improving accuracy.
  • H₂S Sensor with a Filter: Similarly, filters can be used to mitigate the effects of gases like Sulfur Dioxide (SO₂) on Hydrogen Sulfide (H₂S) sensors, which are critical for detecting highly toxic H₂S gas.

3. Implement Sensor Diversity

In areas with complex gas mixtures, consider using different detection technologies that have complementary strengths and weaknesses.

  • For flammable gas detection, using both a catalytic pellistor (good LEL range, but prone to poisoning) and an infrared (IR) sensor (immune to poisoning and high accuracy, but may not detect H₂) provides redundancy and allows for comparison between readings, validating true threats.
Read The Cross Sensitivity Article

Sensor Poisoning and Inhibition

COMING SOON

GS-B-Inst-SensorPoisoning-LP

STOP FALSE NEGATIVES

Exposure to certain chemicals or contaminants (e.g., silicone, lead, sulfur compounds) can chemically damage or "poison" a catalytic or electrochemical sensor, leading to a permanent loss of sensitivity or complete failure. This can cause the sensor to read zero even when gas is present, which is extremely dangerous.


Improper Installation and Placement

COMING SOON

LOCATION IS KEY

For fixed gas detectors, incorrect positioning is a major problem. Gases lighter than air (like Methane) should have sensors near the ceiling, while heavier gases (like Propane or H₂S) should have sensors placed closer to the floor. Incorrect placement can delay or prevent the detection of a leak.

GS-B-Inst-ImproperInstall-LP

Power Supply and Connectivity Problems

COMING SOON

GS-B-Inst-ConnectivityProblems-LP

STAY CHARGED AND PROTECTED

For portable monitors, issues include batteries not holding a charge or physical damage to the charging contacts. For fixed systems, problems range from power surges and interruptions to loose wiring, poor grounding, or electromagnetic interference (EMI) from other industrial equipment, which can all cause system malfunction or signal loss.


Lack of Routine Maintenance and Training

COMING SOON

DON'T SLACK ON MAINTENANCE

Gas detectors aren't "set-it-and-forget-it" tools. A failure to perform regular bump testing and scheduled full calibration is a frequent cause of equipment failure and inaccurate readings. Compounding this, insufficient worker training on proper device operation, maintenance, and alarm response protocols remains a critical safety challenge.

GS-B-Inst-Maintenance-LP

See All Instrumentation